Categories
Uncategorized

Revised Edition of Cataloging Exhibition Publications: Best Practices

Submitted by William Blueher, Manager for Cataloging, Thomas J. Watson Library, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Member of the Cataloging Advisory Committee

In 2009, the ARLIS/NA Cataloging Advisory Committee (CAC) published Cataloging Exhibition Publications: Best Practices (CEP), which is meant to provide practical guidance to catalogers working with art exhibition publications. Much has changed in the art cataloging world since 2009, so the CAC has revised all four of the original chapters, which are now available through ARLIS/NA’s Humanities Commons website.

The first revised chapter, “Assigning Subject and Genre/Form Headings,” provides guidance on assigning a broad range of subject headings. For instance, there are examples of named works of art (600 10 $a Monet, Claude, $d 1840-1926. $t Water lilies $v Exhibitions), exhibitions of private corporate collections (610 20 $a Mellon Bank $x Art collections $v Exhibitions), and topical headings (650 #0 $a Art pottery, French $y 20th century $v Exhibitions). There is also a section on assigning genre/form headings, which now includes an example of Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms, a vocabulary that was not available when CEP was originally published.

The second revised chapter, “Notes,” provides guidance on adding notes at the work, expression, manifestation, and item level (that’s right, we cover the entire WEMI spectrum). For instance, physical description notes are common at the “manifestation level,” so we provide several examples, such as “Issued tête-bêche, each part with a separate title page.” There are dozens of examples throughout the chapter.

The third revised chapter, “Title and Statement of Responsibility,” provides guidance on creating this type of bibliographic information for exhibition publications, which often requires more use of cataloger’s judgment, as well as more intervention in terms of transposing, omitting, and supplying data. For instance, phrases such as “X Gallery presents” and the like sometimes precede the title of the catalog. Our advice: “Do not include these words as part of the title (see RDA Title of manifestation, 08.49.91.11).” And as with all these chapters, there are dozens of examples throughout to help clarify these guidelines.

The fourth revised chapter, “Name and Title Access Points,” provides guidance on choosing name and title access points for exhibition publications, which is complicated by the need to record information about the exhibition as well as the publication. Curators, translators, designers, editors, writers, photographers, and artists whose works are displayed in the exhibition or reproduced in the catalog contribute to the intellectual and artistic content of both the exhibition and the publication. Corporate bodies such as museums, galleries, foundations, governmental agencies, or for-profit corporations may also play an important role in producing or sponsoring the exhibition and/or the catalog. Even information that is exhibition specific, such as the names of exhibition venues or an exhibition name that differs from the title of the publication, is important to record, because users often search for an exhibition catalog by these access points.

Some forms of exhibition documentation, such as brochures or checklists, are produced in-house and may present bibliographical information in an unconventional fashion, requiring the cataloger to look well beyond the title page or even beyond the publication itself. Exhibition publications often require more use of cataloger’s judgment, and more intervention in terms of transposing, omitting, and supplying data.

We hope that the CEP can be a useful guide to many types of catalogers (not just experienced art catalogers), including those who infrequently work with exhibition publications and solo librarians for whom cataloging is only a minor part of their job.

Many thanks to all the CAC members who have contributed to the revision over the years (there have been a lot of us!): Bronwen Bitetti, William Blueher, Katelyn Borbely, Sherman Clarke, Nick Curotto, Tamara Fultz, Marie-Chantal L’Ecuyer-Coelho, John Maier, Christina Manzella, Cheryl Miller, Calli Neumann, Elizabeth O’Keefe, Maria Oldal, Sarah Osborne Bender, Treshani Perera, Alexandra Provo, Andrea Puccio, Raphael Sasayama, Karen Stafford, and Karly Wildenhaus.

Categories
Uncategorized

New Cataloging Podcast: Catapod

Submitted by William Blueher, Manager for Cataloging, Thomas J. Watson Library, Metropolitan Museum of Art

I’m proud to announce the launch of a new podcast about library cataloging and metadata: Catapod.

It will come out monthly, and each episode will feature an in-depth interview with a different cataloger.

For the first month I released two episodes, one featuring ARLIS/NA’s own legendary Sherman Clarke, and the other featuring Jeff Edmunds, author of a three-part series titled “BIBFRAME Must Die.”

You can access the podcast on most podcast platforms:

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/catapod/id1785387387

https://open.spotify.com/show/5FnkJsYx5wgAFApTyyKDTE

https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/1bf1f3e5-0708-47b9-84f2-fa72dc371797

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-catapod-248322509/

https://pca.st/hquwhrwg

Please share this with other librarians who might be interested, and if you have any feedback (or suggestions for potential guests), please email me at catapod.podcast@gmail.com.

Categories
Uncategorized

Updated Chapters of Cataloging Exhibition Publications: Best Practices

Submitted by William Blueher, outgoing chair of the Cataloging Advisory Committee

In 2009, the ARLIS/NA Cataloging Advisory Committee (CAC) published Cataloging Exhibition Publications: Best Practices (CEP), which is meant to provide practical guidance to catalogers working with art exhibition publications. Much has changed in the art cataloging world since 2009, so the CAC has revised three of the original four chapters, which are now available through ARLIS/NA’s Humanities Commons website. 

The first revised chapter, “Assigning Subject and Genre/Form Headings,” provides guidance on assigning a broad range of subject headings. For instance, there are examples of named works of art (600 10 $a Monet, Claude, $d 1840-1926. $t Water lilies $v Exhibitions), exhibitions of private corporate collections (610 20 $a Mellon Bank $x Art collections $v Exhibitions), and topical headings (650 #0 $a Art pottery, French $y 20th century $v Exhibitions). There is also a section on assigning genre/form headings, which now includes an example of Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms, a vocabulary that was not available when CEP was originally published.

The second revised chapter, “Notes,” provides guidance on adding notes at the work, expression, manifestation, and item level (that’s right, we cover the entire WEMI spectrum). For instance, physical description notes are common at the “manifestation level,” so we provide several examples, such as “Issued tête-bêche, each part with a separate title page.” There are dozens of examples throughout the chapter.

The third revised chapter, “Title and Statement of Responsibility,” provides guidance on creating this type of bibliographic information for exhibition publications, which often requires more use of cataloger’s judgment, as well as more intervention in terms of transposing, omitting, and supplying data. For instance, phrases such as “X Gallery presents” and the like sometimes precede the title of the catalog. Our advice: “Do not include these words as part of the title (see RDA Title of manifestation, 08.49.91.11).” And as with all these chapters, there are dozens of examples throughout to help clarify these guidelines.

Some forms of exhibition documentation, such as brochures or checklists, are produced in-house and may present bibliographical information in an unconventional fashion, requiring the cataloger to look well beyond the title page or even beyond the publication itself. Exhibition publications often require more use of cataloger’s judgment, and more intervention in terms of transposing, omitting, and supplying data. 

We hope that the CEP can be a useful guide to many types of catalogers (not just experienced art catalogers), including those who infrequently work with exhibition publications and solo librarians for whom cataloging is only a minor part of their job.

The CAC is currently working on revisions to the final remaining chapter, “Name & Title Access Points,” and we’re hoping to have that revision published by the time we meet for the 2024 ARLIS/NA Conference.

Categories
Uncategorized

Inclusive Subject Headings for Art Collections

Submitted by Treshani Perera, Head of Fine Arts Technical Services, University of Kentucky Libraries

In January 2022, the ARLIS/NA Cataloging Advisory Committee (CAC) launched a form for art library workers to propose changes to problematic art Library of Congress Subject Headings. The committee received 12 submissions. A project team, led by CAC member Treshani Perera, was formed in May 2022 to begin working on possible revisions to submissions. This post outlines the project team’s work from June through December 2022. Special thanks to team members Calli Neumann (CAC member), Alex Provo (CAC member), Melissa Raymond, Christina Manzella, and advisors William Blueher (CAC chair), Andrea Puccio (CAC member), and Sherman Clarke (CAC member) for their contributions. 

One of the suggestions the project team reviewed was to change LCSH Prostitution in art and Prostitutes in art to Sex work in art and Sex workers in art, respectively. In our research, we recognized that these topics aren’t the same for a one-to-one replacement, and that prostitution is a type of sex work. After careful research, we decided to establish a new LCSH Sex work as well as revise existing LCSH Prostitution and establish its hierarchy as a narrower term of the new heading LCSH Sex work. As a result of this direction, our project was expanded to include several new LCSH: Sex work in art, Sex workers in art, Sex workers as artists.

The project team met monthly between June and October 2022, and worked asynchronously (via email) while proposals were awaiting approval from the Library of Congress. Our project was completed in December 2022. The following headings are now available for art library workers to use:

Revised heading: LCSH Prostitution.

New headings: LCSH Sex work (see scope note for when to use this heading), Sex work in art, Sex workers in art, Sex workers as artists.

*While the following headings were not part of our project, they may be of interest to art library workers creating subject access to resources about prostitution and sex work: Prostitutes, Sex workers (Broader Term of Prostitutes), Prostitutes in art

We are currently exploring partnerships with other groups and institutions to revise topics that have wider coverage and are not limited to art related topics. The project team will continue to focus on problematic art, architecture, and design headings in 2023. 

We encourage you to consult our previous Catablog post for more information on getting involved with the project team’s work.

Categories
Uncategorized

ARLIS/NA 2022 Conference & Recent Cataloging News

Cataloging-Related ARLIS/NA Conference Sessions

Banner image announcing the ARLIS/NA 2022 Conference and its theme "Past, Present Future." The text appears on a dark blue shape in front of a cityscape illustration.

This year’s ARLIS/NA Annual Conference takes place in-person in Chicago, Illinois from April 5-9, and there are several sessions of interest to art cataloging and metadata professionals.

If you are unable to attend in-person, the Cataloging Advisory Committee Meeting takes place virtually on Thursday, March 31 at 1pm Central Time: https://sched.co/xYI3

If you’ll be in Chicago, take a look at the following sessions:

  • 4/7, 8:30 a.m.: Confronting Racist or Derogatory Titles in Digitized Photographs: https://sched.co/xYI3
  • 4/8, 8:30 a.m.: Lightning Talks Session 3, ft. “Our Artists, Our Culture: Critically Cataloging the Black Arts Movement”: https://sched.co/v5Np
  • 4/8, 10:30 a.m.: Confronting the Myth of Neutrality: Addressing Bias and Inclusion in Cataloging and Classification in Art Libraries: https://sched.co/uwUJ
  • 4/8, 3 p.m.: Points of Connection: Using Wikidata for Art Information: https://sched.co/uwUn

Cataloging News Roundup

RBMS Controlled Vocabularies, via ARLIS-L:

“On behalf of the Controlled Vocabularies Editorial Group, we are happy to announce the completion of the beta version of the newly integrated RBMS Controlled Vocabulary for Rare Materials Cataloging (RBMS CVRMC), and we are inviting your feedback. RBMS CVRMC is a linked data thesaurus that combines the former RBMS Thesauri (Genre, Binding, Type, Printing and Publishing, Paper, and Provenance) into a single resource with a redesigned structure. It is hosted by the Library of Congress Linked Data Service at https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/rbmscv.html

We encourage you to submit comments, suggestions, and other feedback during the public review of the text, March 25-May 20, 2022. Please submit your feedback using this Google form: https://forms.gle/hndFhN8hgbHyDNVNA

LCSH Change: Slaves to Enslaved Persons, via PCC Listserv:

“In September 2021, a proposal was submitted to change Slaves to Enslaved persons. The Library of Congress took the proposal under advisement for more research and evaluation, and determined that the proposal would be re-considered and a decision would be made in March 2022.
During that time, the original proposer, Rowena Griem of Yale University, worked to improve the change heading proposal and compile a list of all the potentially impacted headings. The SACO African American Subject Funnel, led by Lauren Reno for this project, assisted her. They also agreed to help with research when the time came to make the related proposals. The Library of Congress would like to take this opportunity to thank these catalogers for their work in moving this forward; their assistance has been and will continue to be essential.
Following the period of additional research and internal evaluation, the Library of Congress will support the change of the heading Slaves to Enslaved persons. The March 2022 editorial meeting will be an opportunity to discuss the full outcome of the decision on all related headings and develop a more complete plan for the full project. Due to the large volume of headings associated with the heading change, a special list for Slaves/Enslaved persons will be issued.”

Categories
cataloging Uncategorized

Critically Cataloging Black Arts Movement Material by Nic Caldwell

In 2020, The Morgan Library & Museum acquired a number of materials associated with The Black Arts Movement, which have become essential additions to our holdings of contemporary art and literature. The Black Arts Movement (BAM) was an African-American led artistic and aesthetic movement that was highly active during the 1960s and 1970s. Often called the cultural arm to the Black Power Movement, the goal of BAM was to provide positive and empowering depictions of the Black community, produced by and for Black people.

The innovative aesthetics and production methods of the BAM have heavily influenced African-American cultural production from the 1960s to present. However, these works are often difficult to find, access, and research in libraries and other cultural institutions. This is in part because BAM works disrupt our traditional standards for descriptive cataloging. Works produced by BAM artists were often created collaboratively and involved multiple media, which can complicate our traditional ideas of who counts as contributors to a work and the boundaries we draw between media categories. Additionally, there are paratextual elements of these works that are essential to their discoverability that would not typically be cataloged in more traditionally produced material.

As The Morgan engages in an ongoing review and revision of the language used in our collections catalog as a part of our Critical Cataloging Initiatives, I became interested in how critical, ethical, and anti-racist cataloging comes into play when describing materials created during the Black Arts Movement of the 1960-70s. I will focus on a specific case study of how enhancing catalog records can make these materials more discoverable to researchers, using the example of the African American visual artist Omar Lama.

******

Omar Lama, born John Porter in Halls, Tennessee in 1942, is a visual artist and cofounder of Black artists’ collective AfriCobra. Lama designed multiple, seminal covers for Black Arts publications. However, I could not find his name found in any major The Library of Congress Name Authorities, VIAF, or any other major name authority file. This is likely because his contributions to the importance of these texts as aesthetic and political objects has been overlooked by catalogers.

The cover of "Let's Go Some Where" by Johari Amini, designed by Omar Lama. It features a bold, geometric design in yellow, green and black that draws on Afrocentric motifs.
Johari Amini (b. 1935), Let’s Go Some Where, Chicago: Third World Press, 1973. Image courtesy of The Morgan Library and Museum.

One book acquired by The Morgan, Let’s Go Some Where by Johari Amini (aka Jewel C. Latimore) has a striking cover designed by Lama featuring bold, eye-catching colors and Afro-centric imagery. However, Lama’s name is not printed in the colophon where one would usually look for publication information. Instead it is mentioned in an experimental dedication section in the text. Printed on the bottom of the unnumbered page, Amini writes “Thanks to Brother Omar Lama for the creation of the Alive Cover / … that’s what time it is”. 

The dedication page of "Let's Go Some Where" by Johari Amini. Printed in black on off-white paper, the dedication text is typeset in a unique hexagonal shape, acknowledging many Black Arts Movement participants. Omar Lama is credited for his cover illustration at the bottom of the page.
Johari Amini (b. 1935), Let’s Go Some Where, Chicago: Third World Press, 1973. Image courtesy of The Morgan Library and Museum.

From the history of this publication, we can tell that Omar Lama’s contribution was essential to the overall feel of the publication and how the intended audience, Black readers, received the work. His connection to AfriCobra and the gratitude from the writers whose covers he designed show the collective impulse of the Black Arts Movement. Because of this, it was essential to capture these elements in the cataloging of these materials for researchers interested in BAM. I kept this in mind when creating the MARC record for Let’s Go Some Where. In addition to fully transcribing Amini’s gratitude statement to Lama in a General Note (500) for the object, I was sure to include Lama’s contribution as cover designer in an Added Entry-Personal Name Note (700).

A screen shot from the Voyager Cataloging Module, showing a MARC catalog record for "Let's Go Some Where."
Cataloging Let’s Go Some Where in Voyager cataloging module.

After making sure that these connections could be made locally, the next step was to make sure that Lama’s work could be discoverable by catalogers at other institutions. In consultation with the Manager of Collections Information and Library Systems and The Morgan’s NACO Coordination, I was able to create a Name Authority File record for Lama. Using material from The Morgan’s collection as reference, I was able to add helpful information about Lama such as his place of birth (370), his occupation as an artist (374), and his connection to AfriCobra (373). This makes sure that his work can be consistently attributed when it appears in other publications.

A screen shot from OCLC Connection showing the Name Authority Record for Omar Lama.
Creating Name Authority File Record in OCLC

          The creation of the Name Authority File Record opened up the opportunity to create even more points of access for Lama’s work. His name can now be found in the Virtual International Authority File. Finally, using NAF and VIAF as references, I was also able to create a Wikidata entry for Lama that included more essential information in learning more about his work.

*****

          This example shows how paying close attention to paratextual elements in Black Arts Movement publications can help us question, confront, and improve our cataloging practices.

Categories
Uncategorized

CAC Launches Form to Propose Changes to Problematic Art Subject Headings

We can all agree that despite the excellent work of so many institutional, independent, and collaborative initiatives to improve LCSH, many problematic (or downright offensive) subject headings remain unaddressed. Many hands make light work and the Cataloging Advisory Committee aims to provide a way to connect art librarians who have identified headings in need of revision with art catalogers with SACO access. And while we acknowledge the full range of subjects that can crop up in an art library collection, we are focusing our efforts on headings in art, architecture, design, and related fields. 

An example of a problematic art-related heading is “Blacks in art,” and a potential proposed new term could be “Black people in art.”

Please use this form to propose such changes:
https://forms.gle/9jQKG3osUFpuheTr7

Providing contact information is optional and will not be made public.

Previous submissions can be viewed and commented upon here. If you have SACO experience and would like to get involved with crafting and submitting revision proposals please contact the CAC at:  arlisnacac [at] gmail [dot] com

Categories
conference conference presentations Data visualization Linked Data

Recording Available: Telling Stories with Library Data: Visualization Projects and Tools

ARLIS/NA has now made recordings available of eight sessions from the 49th Annual Conference, held virtually in May 2021. One of the available sessions is Cataloguing II: Telling Stories with Library Data: Visualization Projects and Tools, linked here. This session took place on May 11, 2021, as part of the ARLIS/NA Virtual Conference hosted by the ARLIS/NA MOQ Chapter. Presenters include William Blueher, Michael Cummings, Catherine Derose, Lindsay King, and Alex O’Keefe. The presentations focus on how libraries can leverage their data to create meaningful visual narratives and gain new insights about themselves. Blueher and Cummings shared a case study from the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Watson Library. In their presentation, they explore how Power BI can be used to analyze a library’s data and tell a compelling story. Transforming numbers into narratives gives stakeholders a deeper insight into the impact of the library. Derose, King, and O’Keefe share a second case study on Ensemble@Yale, which is a crowdsourced transcription project that enlists volunteers to generate structured metadata from digitized performance programs in the archives. Both case studies include demonstrations of tools for data collection, cleaning, visualization.

These tools include: 

Categories
conference conference presentations RDA

Recording Available: The Cataloging Manual Reinvented: the New RDA Toolkit and the 3R Project

ARLIS/NA has released recordings of eight sessions from the 2021 ARLIS/NA Virtual Conference, including the session Cataloguing III: The Cataloging Manual Reinvented: the new RDA Toolkit and the 3R Project. This session took place on May 12, 2021, as part of the ARLIS/NA Virtual Conference hosted by the ARLIS/NA MOQ Chapter. Presenters include Sherman Clarke, Liz O’Keefe, Alex Provo, Andrea Puccio, and Karen Stafford. In the presentation, members of the ARLIS/NA Cataloging Advisory Committee give a general overview of the changes to RDA and the major conceptual and functional changes made to the Toolkit with a focus on the needs of art catalogers. RDA and the RDA Toolkit have undergone a substantial revision known as the 3R project (RDA Toolkit Restructure and Redesign). Panelists present on the CAC’s efforts to propose changes to RDA, on the potential creation of an RDA Toolkit application profile for cataloging art material, and the committee’s ongoing revision of the “Cataloging exhibition publications: best practice” document (published by ARLIS/NA in 2010) to comply with RDA standards.

View the recorded session at this link, and check out the official RDA 3R Learning Resources site for information, presentations and tutorials on the new RDA Toolkit.

Categories
Uncategorized

A best practice reminder from the CAC:

A question came to us recently regarding the proper way to assign geographic subdivisions for architecture headings in LCSH. We were grateful for the refresher and reassurance we were on the right track and thought others might appreciate the same.

Question:  Where are the instructions for assigning geographic subdivisions to the subject heading Architecture?

Answer (as found in the scope note for Architecture):

This heading is subdivided by place for works on architecture indigenous to the place named, e.g. Architecture–United States.

The heading is qualified by a national qualifier for works on architecture of the type named in the qualifier but located in other places, e.g. Architecture, American–India.

Examples:

650 #0 Architecture, Chinese $z United States.
650 #0 Architecture $z China $z Beijing.
but not
650 #0 Architecture, Chinese $z China $z Beijing.